A recent survey conducted by Nielsen Mobile suggests wireless-only households now have reached about 17 percent penetration nationwide, and could well hit 20 percent penetration by the end of the year.
But Nielsen also found something else: 10 percent of U.S. households with landline phone service in the second quarter 2008 were previously wireless-only users, and had chosen to buy wired voice service again.
That is important for obvious reasons. Just as some users find wireless-only service to be attractive, 10 percent of users also have found wireless-only service to be unsatisfactory.
The issue is “why?” When we look at the landline tenure of these former wireless-only users, approximately one percent of wireless-only users may return in any given quarter, Nielsen Mobile says.
As it turns out, mobile coverage is sometimes perceived to be insufficient for would-be or former wireless-only users. Dropped calls and poor audio quality are reasons wireless-only users decide a landline service still makes sense.
Sunday, October 12, 2008
Wireless Reconnectors: Wireless-Only Has Downside
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Consumer Feedback on Smartphone AI Isn't That Helpful
It is a truism that consumers cannot envision what they never have seen, so perhaps it is not too surprising that artificial intelligence sm...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
Is there a relationship between screen size and data consumption? One might think the answer clearly is “yes,” based on the difference bet...
No comments:
Post a Comment