A new Federal Communications Commission consent decree with Verizon Communications settles a dispute about whether it is lawful for Verizon to charge a special fee for its users who want to use their Android smart phones as personal hotspots, using some of its 700 MHz spectrum.
The FCC decision concludes that tethering is a lawful end user activity, and no mobile service provider has a right to block access to mobile apps that turn an Android smart phone into a personal Wi-Fi hotspot, based on provisions relating to the acquisition by Verizon of 700 MHz spectrum.
The rules do not seem to apply to Sprint, T-Mobile USA or AT&T, though, as a practical matter, AT&T smart phone users, for example, can use their Android devices as personal hotspots, without additional charge, if they buy certain mobile data plans. Sprint continues to levy a discrete fee for the personal hotspot feature.
The FCC also said that Verizon can charge an additional tethering fee for those customers who are on an unlimited data plan.
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
Tethering is Lawful, No Fee Can be Levied, FCC Rules
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...
No comments:
Post a Comment