An analysis of consumer benefits or costs from usage-based telecom service pricing suggests that regulatory oversight may not improve well-being even in the presence of clear anti-competitive conduct by broadband providers, the Phoenix Center for for Advanced Legal and Economic Public Policy
Studies argues.
Oversight is something regulators and politicians like to say they are conducting. But it won't help, in terms of consumer benefits, the Phoenix Center analysis suggests.
In fact, such practices as charging over-the-top video service providers a fee to reach consumers, though considered an outrage by some policy advocates, actually helps end users.
Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Usage-Based Pricing is Not "Anti-Consumer"
Gary Kim was cited as a global "Power Mobile Influencer" by Forbes, ranked second in the world for coverage of the mobile business, and as a "top 10" telecom analyst. He is a member of Mensa, the international organization for people with IQs in the top two percent.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
How do Computing Products Sold Close to Marginal Cost Recover Capital Investment?
Marginal cost pricing has been a common theme for many computing industry products. The concept is that retail pricing is set in relation t...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
Financial analysts typically express concern when any firm’s customer base is too concentrated. Consider that, In 2024, CoreWeave’s top two ...
No comments:
Post a Comment