The idea of a "smart grid" is sexy. A growing number of communications service providers think "smart grid" projects offer lots of revenue potential for machine to machine communications services. And a recent failure by Xcel Energy in Boulder, Colo. shows why communications service providers should be optimistic.
Xcel Energy planned to launch "the world's biggest project" in Boulder, Colo., and got started in 2007.
Xcel's "SmartGridCity" was supposed to manage power flows, allow more wind and solar on the grid, and enable consumers to control electricity consumption.
Among other things, Xcel spent $21 million to build its own broadband fiberoptic network linking homes, substations and central control in Boulder. Xcel it won't do that again.
Five years later, costs have nearly tripled to $44.5 million, and Xcel wants its Colorado customers to pay for the cost overruns.
That experience might suggest the advantage access providers have: they can provide the communications network function at a fraction of the cost of a power company building its own network.
Sunday, October 28, 2012
Xcel's "Smart Grid" Fails in Boulder, Colo.
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...
No comments:
Post a Comment