The problem with Title II regulation of broadband access is that it relies on a "promise" by regulators not to impose a wider range of traditional common carrier obligations on Internet service providers. This is part one of a three part series.
Here is part two:
Here is part three:
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
The Title II Broadband Credibility Gap: Can An Agency Trust Itself?
Labels:
Phoenix Center,
title II
Gary Kim was cited as a global "Power Mobile Influencer" by Forbes, ranked second in the world for coverage of the mobile business, and as a "top 10" telecom analyst. He is a member of Mensa, the international organization for people with IQs in the top two percent.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Does AI Make Us Dumber?
Does use of artificial intelligence make us “dumber?” More to the point, are thinking skills diminished? And, if so, in what instances? And...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...
No comments:
Post a Comment