Regulatory policies in different nations and regions often take different directions. Right now, U.K. policy for fourth-generation networks and U.S. policy might be headed in different directions. Preparing to auction off new spectrum, Ofcom, the U.K. regulator, has established a framework where four national operators will be allowed to acquire spectrum, the thinking being that the top-four existing 3G providers also each will win spectrum to support 4G.
In the United States, policymakers have to grapple with the immediate issue of a reduction in leading national wireless providers from four to three, if AT&T is allowed to complete its merger with T-Mobile USA. Verizon Wireless has said it is not interested in buying Sprint, but industry analysts are not convinced the market will not boil down to a two-player national market, sooner or later.
Of course, there can be no assurances the number of contestants in the United Kingdom will not consolidate as well, at some point. But the The 4G auction is not expected to be the driver for any such consolidation.
If fact, Ofcom's spectrum auction will be explicitly designed to maintain the existing competitive landscape. There are provisions for regional providesrs to acquire a pair of 10MHz bands at 2.6GHz.
The auction, in principle, could have been designed in other ways. Where regulators want to encourage more entrants, policies can be designed to prevent existing market leaders from acquiring too much spectrum. In other cases they can simply be barred from bidding. In this case, the spectrum auction is designed to maintain the status quo of four national providers.
The U.S. market might be headed the other way, towards a consolidation many have expected to see. AT&T obviously argues the move is "pro--consumer." Doubtless many will discount that claim. The big issue that now may develop is whether the broadband mobile ecosystem is developing so robustly that value, revenue and innovation are, in fact, moving away from the mobile service providers, and into the hands of other ecosystem partners, including device, application and platform providers.
If so, the issue of how many national access providers can exist will become less important.
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
4G Policy Diverging in U.K., U.S. Markets?
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
DIY and Licensed GenAI Patterns Will Continue
As always with software, firms are going to opt for a mix of "do it yourself" owned technology and licensed third party offerings....
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...
No comments:
Post a Comment