Ovum forecasts that by 2016 mobile operators will have lost $54 billion in text messaging (short message service, or SMS) revenues from over the top social messaging services on smart phones.
That would be more than double the $23 billion mobile service providers are expected to have lost by the end of 2012.
Ovum analysts believe that collaboration with handset manufacturers is imperative if operators are to remain relevant and competitive in the messaging industry.
Service providers in Europe and Asia-Pacific will be affected the most, Ovum says. What remains unclear is whether Rich Communication Suite (RCS) will allow operators to slow the rate of displacement.
About 75 percent of Dutch smart phone owners have WhatsApp installed on their device, with more than 80 percent of these using the app at least once per day, Ovum notes.
This translates into a presence of more than 5.5 million smart phones in the Netherlands. Among iPhone users, WhatsApp has about 90 percent penetration.
Friday, October 12, 2012
Mobile Service Providers Will Lose $54 Billion Worth of Text Messaging Revenue by 2016
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Which Firm Will Use AI to Boost Revenue by an Order of Magnitude?
Ultimately, there is really only one way for huge AI infrastructure investments up by an order of magnitude over cloud computing investment ...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
Is there a relationship between screen size and data consumption? One might think the answer clearly is “yes,” based on the difference bet...
No comments:
Post a Comment