There's really no way to say for certain whether U.S. network neutrality rules have shifted investment decisions. A rational actor, owning both mobile and fixed assets, might well conclude that higher investment returns are gotten from deploying capital to support the mobile networks, rather than the fixed networks.
But departing Federal Communications Commission member Robert McDowell speculates that mandating "best effort only" policies for the fixed network, while allowing mobile networks to potentially provide quality of service features could have something to do with investment decisions.
To be sure, telco and cable TV operator capital investment is down substantially from late 1990s levels. But those reductions predate the net neutrality rules.
Monday, March 25, 2013
Are Net Neutrality Rules Stifling Fixed Network Investment?
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Directv-Dish Merger Fails
Directv’’s termination of its deal to merge with EchoStar, apparently because EchoStar bondholders did not approve, means EchoStar continue...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...
No comments:
Post a Comment