At least in some quarters, we are in a growing hype cycle related to software defined networks. As I simplistically understand it, SDN is about separating the "control plane" from the "data plane."
In a probably over-simplistic way, that means putting intelligence in a headend or central office location, while using much-simpler, cheaper devices "out in the network" that only have to deal with "data," while the centralized controller does the computation that formerly was "out in the network."
The broad analogy will be familiar to those who once worked with "client-server" computing architectures. It isn't a case of "mainframe-dumb terminal" models, because the SDN clients are not "dumb" devices. But the big computation loads are handled centrally (control plane) while the many distributed data plane devices can work fast because they don't have to deal with local computing chores, and just handle the data.
As we typically do, there will be years of wrangling over "what SDN" really is, and how it is implemented. There will be many attempts to graft SDN onto the existing base of platforms that actually have intelligent devices scattered all over the network.
What probably will be lost is the "so what" part of the discussion, for service providers or their customers.
Most lost in the discussion will be the end user benefit. But some might argue that's what we really should be talking about.
It is perhaps not required that SDN be used to provide a user-defined set of policies relating to use of bandwidth. That could logically be provided other ways, including the use of intelligent devices scattered throughout the network.
But it might arguably be much easier, much faster, more dynamic and more affordable to supply end-user define policies on an SDN network than it is today.
For service providers the advantages might be even simpler. SDN might enable "bandwidth on demand" in a reliable, robust, affordable way.
But all that will likely be lost in the wave of hype we are about to start hearing.
Thursday, March 21, 2013
What is SDN Good For?
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Directv-Dish Merger Fails
Directv’’s termination of its deal to merge with EchoStar, apparently because EchoStar bondholders did not approve, means EchoStar continue...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...
No comments:
Post a Comment