Bandwidth caps are a contentious issue in some quarters, the argument being that it is somehow injurious to customers when "reasonable" usage quotas are a normal condition of service.
There seems to be no such resistance to the notion that consumption of many other products, including electricity, water, gasoline, natural gas, soap, vegetables, salt, sugar or meat is consumption based.
New consumption caps for Mediacom high-speed access customers arguably are not going to be a problem for 98 percent of Mediacom customers. Those new plans will be an issue for perhaps two percent of the highest users.
•Mediacom Launch 150GB (3 Mbps)
•Mediacom Prime 250GB (12-15 Mbps)
•Mediacom Prime Plus 350GB (20 Mbps)
•Mediacom Ultra 999GB (50 Mbps)
•Mediacom Ultra Plus 999GB (105 Mbps)
Friday, August 3, 2012
Mediacom Consumption Caps Won't be a Problem for 98% of Users
Gary Kim was cited as a global "Power Mobile Influencer" by Forbes, ranked second in the world for coverage of the mobile business, and as a "top 10" telecom analyst. He is a member of Mensa, the international organization for people with IQs in the top two percent.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...
No comments:
Post a Comment