In response to calls to "do something" about the excess cash Apple has been piling up (about $98 billion at the moment), Apple today plans to initiate a dividend and share repurchase program, starting later in 2012..
Apple plans to initiate a quarterly dividend of $2.65 per share sometime in the fourth quarter of its fiscal 2012, which begins on July 1, 2012. Apple also has authorized a $10 billion share repurchase program to start in the Apple's fiscal 2013 business year, which begins on September 30, 2012.
The repurchase program is expected to be executed over three years, with the primary objective of neutralizing the impact of dilution from future employee equity grants and employee stock purchase programs.
You might argue that Apple alternatively could have plowed more of its cash back into building its business, but Apple in recent years has been cautious about undertaking large acquisitions, so the refusal to make a big, "game-changing" acquisition was not unexpected.
The new plans might represent a cash outlay of about $15 billion a year.
Monday, March 19, 2012
Apple to Initiate Dividend and Share Repurchase Program
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Consumer Feedback on Smartphone AI Isn't That Helpful
It is a truism that consumers cannot envision what they never have seen, so perhaps it is not too surprising that artificial intelligence sm...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
Is there a relationship between screen size and data consumption? One might think the answer clearly is “yes,” based on the difference bet...
No comments:
Post a Comment