Is the U.S. mobile market about to be disrupted? Looking at the launch of the FreedomPop service and the coming Softbank purchase of Sprint, you might argue that a price disruption is coming.
Softbank will buy a 70 percent stake in Sprint Nextel Corp.for about $20 billion in the biggest-ever acquisition of a U.S. telecom firm by a Japanese firm. Softbank hopes it can replicate the success it has had in Japan in taking on dominant mobile service providers.
Some predict Softbank will launch a major price war to upend the U.S. market, as it did earlier in the Japanese market. That might lead some observers to speculate about whether the Softbank-owned Sprint will try to become the “Free Mobile” of the U.S. market.
In France, the Illiad-owned “Free Mobile” has disrupted the French mobile market. Already, FreedomPop is trying to disrupt mobile broadband pricing, as the Illiad Free Mobile effort already has done in the French mobile market.
In 2006, when Softbank decided to buy Vodafone KK assets, it likewise was criticized in some quarters for undertaking a risky gambit.
Some will argue Softbank is taking another huge risk by entering a country where iit has no previous operating experience, and by assuming a huge new debt load, after only recently shedding a similar debt load.
Softbank argues it is a reasonable risk, and that its prior experience taking on NTT Docomo and KDDI show it can compete in a market dominated by larger service providers.
Softbank, many believe, will use the same strategy it used in Japan, which some would describe as providing a large number of complementary features or services to create a “sticky” relationship with the end user.
Others will point to the pricing strategy. In Japan, Softbank’s 2006 acquisition of the Vodafone unit was not universally considered wise. But in just one year, Softbank managed to boost its subscriber base from 700,000 in fiscal 2006 to 2.7 million.
By the beginning of 2008, Softbank had grabbed 44 percent of Japan’s new mobile subscribers, well ahead of KDDI’s 35 percent and NTT-DoCoMo’s 11 percent.
Some think Softbank will be willing to launch a price war. In Japan, Softbank was willing to sacrifice voice average revenue per unit to make market share gains.
Back in the 2006 to 2008 period, Softbank was willing to accept a $13 a month ARPU decline to build market share.
Softbank said it would acquire a majority stake in the U.S. carrier by buying $8 billion of shares directly from Sprint and then buying another $12.1 billion of shares in the market, completing the deal in 2013, assuming there are no regulatory snags.
Softbank probably is betting that it can make subscriber gains in the U.S. market by following its earlier Japan market tactics. Also, it likely is betting that the U.S. market is ripe for a bit of disruption, as it is, by some analysis, less competitive than many other markets.
Monday, October 15, 2012
Will Softbank-lead Sprint Try to Disrupt U.S. Mobile Pricing?
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Which Firm Will Use AI to Boost Revenue by an Order of Magnitude?
Ultimately, there is really only one way for huge AI infrastructure investments up by an order of magnitude over cloud computing investment ...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
Is there a relationship between screen size and data consumption? One might think the answer clearly is “yes,” based on the difference bet...
No comments:
Post a Comment