To me, this reads more like a statement of principles and direction than "rules." That likely is by design. That also means if the court challenges do not invalidate the entire order, we are in for a long period of gradual testing of what each of the principles actually means.
It appears we don't really know much, yet, especially since the actual language hasn't been released.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45749183/Net-neutrality-statement-by-Julius-Genachowski-the-FCC-chair-on-Dec-21-2010
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
FCC Net Neutrality "Rules" are More Like "Principles"
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Where Will AI Prove an Existential Threat to Whole Industries?
Right now, we all speculate about the potential changes artificial intelligence might bring, as well. Predictions range from the existential...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
Who gets to use spectrum, and concerns about interference from other users, now appears to be an issue for Google’s Project Loon in India. ...
1 comment:
They are principles because that text is a speech. Those who want to regulate the internet are so flamingly incompetent that they can't even make a pdf of their own order and put it online.
Post a Comment