To me, this reads more like a statement of principles and direction than "rules." That likely is by design. That also means if the court challenges do not invalidate the entire order, we are in for a long period of gradual testing of what each of the principles actually means.
It appears we don't really know much, yet, especially since the actual language hasn't been released.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45749183/Net-neutrality-statement-by-Julius-Genachowski-the-FCC-chair-on-Dec-21-2010
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
FCC Net Neutrality "Rules" are More Like "Principles"
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Consumer Feedback on Smartphone AI Isn't That Helpful
It is a truism that consumers cannot envision what they never have seen, so perhaps it is not too surprising that artificial intelligence sm...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
Is there a relationship between screen size and data consumption? One might think the answer clearly is “yes,” based on the difference bet...
1 comment:
They are principles because that text is a speech. Those who want to regulate the internet are so flamingly incompetent that they can't even make a pdf of their own order and put it online.
Post a Comment