Most observers who regularly follow such things have noted for some time that online video consumption is growing so fast that it will inevitably affect the way ISPs--wireless and wireline--price the use of access facilities. Bandwidth caps, higher fees and other changes to terms and conditions are conceivable.
But the new peering dispute between Level 3 Communications and Comcast also points out the coming changes in backbone interconnection agreements as well. Online video is extremely asymmetrical. Unlike voice or chat, where the volume of traffic is about equal in both directions, video is unbalanced in the downstream path.
That's why cable and satellite networks have been built the way they are, to favor delivery of lots of downstram bits, but few or much-fewer upstream bits. Broadcast TV and broadcast radio are other networks historically designed for media delivery, not two-way communications.
Broadband networks mostly have been designed around asymmetrical traffic flow.
Voice and similar radio networks, on the other hand, always have been designed around symmetrical traffic flow.
Asymmetrical bandwidth has not been a particular cost driver for media delivery networks. But asymmetrical traffic always drives carrier interconnection costs, pricing arbitrage, and revenue models in the communications business.
If one network imposes hugely unequal traffic load on another, the receiving network gets paid for that unequal use of facilities. But if video content gets as big as most observers think it will be, unbalanced traffic will occur on a scale never seen before. So will payments by "sending" networks to "receiving" networks.
That means higher costs for "sending" networks and higher revenue for "receiving" networks. To put matters another way, the historic value of access networks is about to be shown, and access network operators will get a revenue boost. If you think "carrier compensation" fights have been interminable before, just watch. Inter-carrier compensation is about to get more complicated than we've ever seen it.
Monday, December 6, 2010
Online Video Will Change Lots of Things, Including Peering and Transit Pricing
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Changes in Capex Intensity Matter More than Intensity Itself
Lots of industries are capital intensive, and one might argue such industries tend to be slower growing, such as carbon-based energy; utilit...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...
No comments:
Post a Comment