When Telecom Markets Stabilize, What Will the Structure Look Like?

 We are now some several decades into a process of regulatory, competitive and technology changes that change the shape of telecom markets. Where once every market was a sanctioned monopoly, we have moved to new market structures where there are multiple providers. What is not clear is how new stable market structures will develop, and what form those structures might take.

In a competitive industry, one might expect to find a stable structure where the market share leader has twice the share of provider number two, while provider number two has twice the share of provider number three. So a 40-20-10 structure would be possible.

In many highly fragmented industries, there could be scores of firms with single-digit share, with a 20-10-five structure, or even more fragmented than that, in terms of brands.

In the smartphone market, the leader market share of the top-three providers was 35-23-five, for example, in 2016.

In the U.S. browser market n 2015, Chrome had 40 percent share, followed by Internet Explorer at 31 percent, then Firefox at 16 percent.

Telecom, for course, is a highly-capital-intensive industry, with the consequence of oligopoly structures. Whether stable markets eventually will be lead by two, three, four or even more providers is unclear.

In South Korea, Korea Telecom had in 2014 43 percent share; SK Telecom 22 percent, LG Uplus 17 percent.

In Japan, in 2007, NTT had 53 percent, KDDI 29 percent, Softbank 17 percent share. By 2013, NTT had 41 percent, Softbank had 30 percent, while KDDI had 29 percent share.

In many mobile markets, there is a tendency for three providers to hold significant share, with a range from 40-percent range for the leader to 20-percent range each for the others.

But even some app industries show an oligopolistic pattern. In the U.S. mobile advertising market, Google has 32 percent share, Facebook 20 percent, Twitter four percent.

The point is that, eventually, an oligopoly structure lead by just a few firms (three or two) is a reasonably safe bet, in either mobile segment. In larger markets with multiple fixed and mobile providers, it is possible a stable structure could develop with four or more providers. We just do not know, yet, as telecom markets arguably have not reached a stable state.
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Voice Usage and Texting Trends Headed in Opposite Directions

Spectrum Fees, High Incremental Capex, Lower Value in Ecosystem Mean Historic Changes Might be Necessary

For Ting, Operating Costs are Key to Business Model